You're insured for a building that's gone
The rate wasn't wrong. It was priced on a house I'd already torn out.
Maybe this has happened to you. I got a new insurance quote on my house and the number was high. Higher than it should have been. So I did the thing most people don’t bother to do. I called and asked why.
The answer was simple. “Your house was built in 1990. Same electrical. Same HVAC.”
Here’s the part that stung. None of that was true anymore. I had gutted the place. New panel, new wiring, new mechanical systems. The house behind my drywall had nothing in common with the house on their file.
But until I told them, I was paying a premium for a building that no longer existed.
The Reality: insurers don’t price what they know. They price what they assume. And the assumption is always the worst version of your building, frozen at the year it was built.
And here’s the part that should make you sit up. Your lender does the exact same thing.
Think about what an underwriter actually has when they price your risk. A year built. A square footage. Maybe a roof age someone wrote down once. They are not standing in your mechanical room. They are pricing a spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet defaults to old, tired, and risky unless someone proves otherwise.
That someone is you.
I have spent 20 years on the other side of this. I have engineered the systems these files describe, across 400-plus projects in more than 20 countries. I can tell you with certainty that the gap between what a building is and what its paperwork says is enormous. A 1990 build with a 2024 electrical system is a different risk than a 1990 build with 1990 wiring. Completely different. The fire data alone separates them.
But the file doesn’t know that. The file says 1990. So you pay 1990 money, every year, forever, on a risk you already eliminated.
Why does this matter beyond one annoying bill? Because it compounds. An insurance premium priced on a phantom system doesn’t hit you once. It hits you every renewal, for as long as you own the asset. On a portfolio, that’s real money leaking out the side of your operating statement. And a lender who prices you as the old building charges you for risk you already retired. You eat that spread on every draw.
The fix is not complicated. It’s evidence.
🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.
Here is exactly what I keep, and what I hand over when I want to be priced on the building I actually own.
Start with photographs, dated. The new panel with the label legible. The new condensing unit with the model plate visible. New supply lines, new water heater, new roof underlayment before it got covered. If you replaced it and nobody can see it anymore, that’s precisely the thing you photograph, because that’s the upgrade you’re not getting credit for.
Then the paper. Permits, pulled and closed. Contractor invoices with scope and date. Spec sheets for the equipment you installed. A closed permit is the strongest single document you own, because a third party already verified the work. Keep them in one folder, named by system, so you’re not digging the night before a renewal.
Then translate it. Don’t hand an underwriter a shoebox. Write one page. System, what it was, what it is now, the year you changed it. “Electrical: original 1990 panel and branch wiring, fully replaced 2024, permit closed.” That sentence moves a number. Vague good intentions don’t.
Be specific about the things that actually move risk, because not every upgrade does. New paint doesn’t. A new roof, updated electrical, replaced plumbing supply lines, a modern HVAC system, added fire protection — those are the line items that change how a building burns, floods, or fails. Lead with those. The carrier and the lender care about the systems that cause the claims.
Then find a broker who can tell the story. The right insurance broker doesn’t just file your packet. They paint the picture of why your building is a better risk than its year built suggests. That’s their job. Hand them the evidence and let them do it. The owners who get the rate are the ones who give the broker something to work with.
I did all of this with one phone call and a folder. The rate moved. Not because I argued. Because I changed the assumption with evidence.
The bottom line: you are not priced on your building. You are priced on the last thing someone wrote down about it. And what gets written down defaults to the worst version of the truth.
So change the record. The same packet that lowers an insurance premium is the packet that earns you better terms from a lender, because both of them are pricing the same unknown and both of them will keep guessing high until you stop letting them.
You can keep paying for the building you used to have, or you can document the one you actually built and get priced on it. That choice is yours, and nobody else is going to make it for you.
—Jon
P.S. The full system-by-system version of this, every component and what a buyer or lender flags, is The $100K Blind Spot. Grab it here.