Tax Breaks That Sound Too Good to Be True… But Aren’t
The good and bad of RE taxes
Recently, a high-earning investor shared something that stopped me in my tracks—he paid 36% in taxes last year. That’s $36,000 out of every $100,000 earned, gone before mid-May. It’s a tough reality many successful professionals face.
Naturally, the question that follows is: Can passive investing help reduce that tax burden?
Some general partners promise a confident yes. But the truth? It’s nuanced. Passive investing can bring meaningful tax advantages—but only if you understand how they work and when they apply.
Misunderstanding this could mean leaving money (or losses) on the table, or worse, expecting tax relief that never comes.
Tax Breaks That Sound Too Good to Be True… But Aren’t (With a Few Strings Attached)
Let’s break it down…
Depreciation & Bonus Depreciation: The Phantom Expense with Real Value
The Passive Loss Problem Most Don’t Talk About
Exceptions: When Passive Losses Can Offset Active Income
1. Depreciation & Bonus Depreciation: The Phantom Expense with Real Value
The tax benefits of real estate start with depreciation—an IRS-approved way to account for the wear and tear of a physical asset. Because buildings (not land) age, the IRS allows you to deduct a portion of the property’s value each year. That deduction lowers your taxable income, even while the property may increase in market value. It’s a classic example of what’s often called a “phantom expense”—a paper loss that creates real tax advantages.
Then there’s bonus depreciation. Originally introduced via legislation in 2017, it allows investors to accelerate those deductions and take them up front, rather than over many years. In its heyday, 100% of bonus depreciation could be claimed in year one—assuming a cost segregation study was done. That number now sits at 40% in 2025, but it’s still a powerful tool.
In one recent case, a $100K investment into a multifamily deal generated a $50K passive loss in year one. That’s significant. But…
The Passive Loss Problem Most Don’t Talk About
Here’s the catch—passive losses can only offset passive income.
Read that again…passive losses can only offset passive income.
Most investor’s tax problems stemmed from W2 income. The depreciation losses from real estate investments are useless against active income unless there is a qualification for special exemptions.
And even when those losses build up (which they can), they’re often locked away, waiting to be used against future passive gains.
Another piece often overlooked: depreciation must be recaptured when the property sells. Unless you plan to defer taxes indefinitely or hold until death, Uncle Sam eventually comes knocking.
🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.
Exceptions: When Passive Losses Can Offset Active Income
There are two key exceptions that allow passive losses to work harder:
1. Real Estate Professional Status (REPS):
If you—or your spouse—spend most of your working hours in real estate and materially participate, you may qualify for REPS. This turns passive losses into active ones, allowing them to offset W2 or business income. But for most full-time professionals, it’s out of reach.
2. Short-Term Rental Loophole:
By meeting IRS participation and management requirements, short-term rentals (like Airbnb) can also convert passive losses into active ones. One investor used this strategy in 2022 to offset income from a tech job. But it requires careful planning and ongoing involvement—not exactly hands-off.
So, Can LPs Reduce Their Taxes Through Real Estate?
Yes—with some caveats. In one example, an investor placed $75K into a deal as a limited partner. That investment:
Returned steady monthly cash flow
Generated enough depreciation to offset all gains from distributions
Provided a passive loss to apply against future passive profits
Positioned the investor for future tax-deferred returns of capital via refinancing
It’s not a shortcut—but it is a smart, strategic advantage when done right and consistently applied across a well-structured portfolio.
Bottom line? Passive investing won’t eliminate your tax bill. But with the right knowledge and strategy, it can create meaningful tax efficiency—especially when scaled thoughtfully.
If you're curious about how this works in our multifamily investment model, or want to see a real-life example of how depreciation shows up in your K-1, we’d be happy to walk you through it.
Jon
Thanks for reading Drops of Change! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.