A dirty building shows you everything. Water stains, cracks, rust, the whole story is right there on the surface.

When it’s clean, you can inspect. When someone has just painted over all of it, you can’t.

That’s not me being paranoid. That’s the oldest move in real estate.

Fresh paint tells your eye that everything is fine. It’s the first thing a seller does and the last thing you should trust.

Paint is cheap. What paint sits next to usually isn’t.

So here’s the part that should change how you walk a building.

The defects that cost you the most don’t hide. They sit in plain sight, dressed up to look like nothing.

You walk right past them and feel fine. That feeling is the trap.

Let me show you four of them, the ones I slow down for every single time.

Start where the building meets the dirt. There’s a caulk joint where the exterior wall meets the ground, and on a lot of buildings it’s cracked open.

It looks like nothing. A twenty-dollar tube of sealant would close it. Ignored, it takes down a foundation.

On a slab-on-grade building there’s no footing under that wall. The slab is the foundation.

Water gets in through the gap, runs under the slab, and washes out the soil holding it up. The support disappears, the slab moves, and the cracks telegraph up through the pretty drywall you were just admiring.

A twenty-dollar joint becomes a structural repair with a number I don’t like to say out loud.

Now look at the foundation and basement walls for a white, chalky bloom. It looks like someone spilled powder and wiped it half off.

That’s efflorescence, and it isn’t cosmetic. It’s the fingerprint of water moving through the concrete itself, carrying dissolved salts, evaporating on the inside face, and leaving the minerals behind.

The stain doesn’t matter. The water path it’s mapping for you matters a lot.

Then look for reddish-brown streaks weeping out of concrete or masonry. That rust bleed is steel corroding inside the wall.

Rebar, a lintel over a window, a wall tie, a railing anchor. Corroding steel swells as it rusts and cracks the concrete gripping it, from the inside out.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

What reads as age is structural steel quietly losing its section. By the time it stains the surface, it’s been working away on the inside for years.

And watch for the one freshly painted wall, or the single repainted ceiling, in an otherwise tired building. Spot-painting is a confession.

Someone covered a water stain because the stain told a story they didn’t want told.

Years ago I was walking a 200-unit building where the escorts kept steering us away from certain units. We tracked the numbers, realized which ones we’d been kept out of, and went back on our own.

Behind the doors we weren’t supposed to open were black-spotted ceilings and mold. The dodge was the finding. The clean parts were the cover.

Here’s why these cheap little tells matter so much. If you can see poor conditions on the surface, there are more below it, without a doubt.

The surface is a table of contents for what’s underneath. The problems that actually break a deal are the ones you can’t see at all.

I once scoped a main plumbing line and found the break ten feet past the wall, underground. Caught early, that’s thirty to fifty thousand dollars.

Found after closing, it’s north of half a million, with a sewage backup and residents displaced.

No listing photo shows that. No quick walkthrough finds it. But the surface will often warn you it’s coming, if you know the four tells that point to it.

None of this needs a thermal camera or a lab. It needs you to slow down at the boring parts.

The base of the walls. The corners of the basement. The one ceiling that looks newer than the rest.

A seller dresses up the eye-level story, the kitchen and the entry, because that’s where your attention goes. The truth sits down at the floor line and along the foundation, where nobody bothers to look.

Walk the perimeter low and slow, and the building starts talking.

That’s the whole skill. I don’t read a building to admire it.

I read the surface as the first page of a report the seller didn’t want to hand me. The cracked joint, the powder, the rust, the one repainted wall.

Each one is the building telling me what the seller won’t.

A building can’t hide what it’s doing. It can only dress it up. Your job is to read past the paint.

Do that, and you stop buying the marble and the finishes and start reading the four tells that were trying to warn you the whole time. That’s the difference between touring a building and actually seeing it.

Eyes Open,

Jon

PS: These four tells are just the first page. I wrote down the whole read, every system and what each miss actually costs, in The $100K Blind Spot. Get it here.

Subscribe now

On LinkedIn that reads like a badge. Here is the fuller, dumber, more honest version.

I never unpacked the bag. It sat by the door the whole few hours I was home. I am not sure I slept. I know I did not shower before I left again, because there was not time. I flew the same 12 hours back, landed in the same heat, walked into the same store, and got to work like the round trip home had been a coffee break. That is not a heroic image. That is a grown man treating his own body like carry-on luggage.

And I did it without blinking. That is the part I want to sit with, because at the time it felt completely normal.

That was me all in, helping build Apple stores across 20+ countries. All in has a cost, though, and nobody puts the cost in the highlight reel.

Here is one piece of mine. I am a Type 1 diabetic. Have been since I was 11. My blood sugar does not care what continent I am on or how many hours I have been awake. I have gone dangerously low on a plane at takeoff, strapped into a seat with no fast way to fix it. Every one of those turnarounds was me rolling that dice again. The schedule was brutal on anyone. On someone managing a disease every hour of every day, it was a real gamble, and I took it over and over because the job asked.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

The other cost was time. Years of it. I was on planes when I could have been home. I was in mechanical rooms in cities I can barely picture now. Washing my clothes in a hotel sink when flights got canceled. Splicing wires at 3am because a contractor got it wrong. I gave a company the best hours of a decade and I never once asked whether it was reasonable. You don’t ask. When you are all in, “reasonable” is not a question you let yourself hear.

I want to be careful here. I am not telling you this so you feel bad for me. I chose all of it, and I would not trade what it taught me. The standard I built in those years is real, and it never left me. When someone hands me their capital now, the guy who got back on the plane is the guy who shows up. That has not changed and it will not.

What changed is who I do it for.

Back then I got on the plane because a boss said come back, and saying no felt impossible. Now I get on the plane, so to speak, because I decided to. I run a debt fund. I buy buildings. I still work like the mission is real, because it is. Someone’s money is on the line. But I am not doing it for a person who owns my time anymore. I do it for people who trust me with theirs. That is a completely different thing, even when the effort looks identical from the outside.

I work for people who trust me, not people who own me. It took a decade of 6am airport turnarounds to earn the right to say that, and to mean it.

So yes, I got on the plane. I would get on it again tomorrow. The only difference now is that it is my name on the ticket, and my choice at the gate.

If you ever want to know who is really handling capital before you hand any over, that is the whole test. Watch what they do when saying no would be completely fair.

That is the standard behind Blue Eyed Private Debt Fund I. Link in profile if you want to look.

Eyes Open,

Jon

Subscribe now

I read the deck, I liked the sponsor, I trusted the person that referred me in, and I wrote the check. Then I did what passive investors do. I waited for the updates.

For a while they came like clockwork. Then they came slower. Then they came with less in them. Then they stopped.

I told myself the quiet meant the team was heads-down building. That was the mistake. Quiet from an operator is almost never good news.

One email finally landed. The money was all but gone, and foreclosure was coming.

The person I trusted texted me this: “Just wanted to give you a heads up.” A heads up. On money that was already gone.

By the time I read it, there was nothing left to decide.

Here’s what that silence actually taught me.

It wasn’t the first time I’d watched quiet turn into zero. I’ve sat passive in a multifamily deal that returned nothing over three years too. IT was a huge company, Fundrise.

The shape is always the same. The updates thin out, the calls get shorter, and the investor is the last person in the building to learn the truth.

An operator goes quiet for one of two reasons. Once in a while it’s fraud. Far more often it’s avoidance.

They don’t have good news, so they say nothing, and they pray the next quarter fixes what this quarter broke. Either way, your money is gone by the time you hear a word about it.

The thing people get backwards is that the foreclosure email was the failure. It wasn’t.

The failure was every update that got a little thinner for six months before it. The cadence was the signal. I just wasn’t reading it.

There was never an honest call. Never a “we’re in trouble, here’s the number, here’s the plan, here’s your decision.”

A real capital call is a hard conversation you have on purpose, early, while there’s still a decision left to make. What I got instead was six months of silence and then a headline.

So when I run capital now, I communicate like the person on the other end is me. Because on that storage deal, it was.

Good news travels fast on its own. I make the bad news travel faster.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

On the building I operate day to day, I’m on the phone with my administrator several times a week, we hold a standing meeting every week, and a financial report goes out weekly to her, to the bookkeeper, and to me, whether the number is good or not.

The rent roll and the invoices for all 114 residents run on a system, so the reporting never waits on someone remembering to send it. The month it’s ugly is the month I want that report in more hands, not fewer.

That’s the whole standard. Send the update you would want to get. Especially the one that admits you were wrong.

An honest update isn’t a victory lap. It names what slipped, what it costs, and what I’m doing about it, in plain language, not the padded tone a big shop uses to say a lot and tell you nothing.

If a number is soft, I want you to hear it from me while it’s still small, not read it later when it isn’t. That’s not a courtesy. It’s the job.

The cost of getting this wrong isn’t a line on a statement. It’s the person who trusted you finding out last, when the only thing left to do is absorb it.

That’s the part that stayed with me. Not the money. The order people found out in.

Here’s where the discipline shows up in the numbers. Across nineteen loans and about 3.97 million dollars put to work, the default rate is still zero.

Not because every borrower had a clean quarter. Some didn’t.

It holds because when a loan wobbles, the people whose money is in it hear from me first, not last, and we deal with the hard version of the truth while there’s still room to act on it.

So before you wire money to anyone, test the communication, not just the return.

Ask what their update schedule is, and hold them to it. Ask what they’ll tell you when a quarter goes sideways, and listen for whether they’ve ever actually had to. Ask if they’ve ever made a capital call, and how they treated the people on the other end of it.

The answers tell you more than the pro forma ever will.

You don’t earn trust in the good quarters. Anyone looks honest when the wire clears on time. You earn it in the quarter you have to call and say the thing you would rather not say out loud.

Silence is how operators lose other people’s money. Communication is how you keep it. They’re the same skill, pointed in opposite directions.

The return is what an operator shows you. The update is who they are when it goes wrong. Learn to read the update, and you stop being the last one to know.

Eyes Open,

Jon

P.S. What’s a hard thing you’re grinding through right now that might be hard-by-accident? Reply and tell me. I read every one, whether it’s about a building or a deal.

Subscribe now

She was the breadwinner.

Not a second income. The main one. New baby in the house, and the paycheck we leaned on the most just stopped. The company folded. Late 2024. One week there was a salary, the next there was a quiet kitchen and a decision to make.

That is the version of this story where a lot of families come apart. Ours didn’t. And I want to be honest about why, because it had nothing to do with being naturally calm people.

We had spent 9 years getting ready for exactly that week.

Here is what that actually looked like, and none of it is glamorous. We saved close to half of what we earned. Half. When Apple was paying me well, we lived like it wasn’t. Same cars. We didn’t upgrade the house every time the number went up. People thought we were strange about money. We were. On purpose.

We built more than one stream of income, so no single one could take us down. And we kept a rainy day fund that could cover a rainy year, not a rainy week. A month of expenses in the bank is not a plan. It is a countdown.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

So when the paycheck disappeared, nothing in our life had to change that day. No fire sale. No panic call to family. No 3am math. The cushion was already under us, because we poured it back when we didn’t need it. That is the whole trick. You cannot build a runway while the plane is already going down.

Now here is the part that still gets me.

My wife did not spend that time waiting for the next job to come rescue her. She started building something of her own. She found a commercial lot in our town and started a food truck business on it. Trucks first. The plan is a permanent building after that, 12 units of housing on the same piece of land. Phase one is parked and serving now. Phase two is on paper.

She lost a job and turned it into the first brick of something she owns. I married up. I say that a lot, and I mean it more every year.

People hear “resilience” and think it is a personality. Some people are just born tougher. I don’t buy that. Resilience is not a mood you summon on the bad day. It is a structure you pour on the good days, when everything is fine and building a cushion feels boring and unnecessary. The boring day is when the work gets done.

That same instinct is exactly how I lend. Short duration, so my money is never trapped when the world turns. Real collateral, so there is a floor under the downside. Margin of safety, so I never reach for a yield that would keep me up at night. I don’t lend that way because I read it somewhere. I lend that way because I have lived what a real cushion buys you. It buys you the ability to keep your head. That is worth more than any rate.

The night my wife’s job ended, I slept fine. Not because I am cold. Because 9 years earlier, we decided the future was going to happen whether we prepared for it or not.

Build the runway before you need it. Then, when the bad year shows up, you get to stay calm, and maybe even start something new on the same lot where the old thing ended.

That is the discipline behind Blue Eyed Private Debt Fund I too. Same rules, someone else’s money. Link in profile if you want to see how it is built.

Eyes Open,

Jon

Subscribe now

About a month in, I had time on my hands, so I walked into a free real estate investing class. Then I signed up for a three-day workshop. The whole room kept repeating the same phrase. Find your value add. Find your value add.

I sat there and it hit me. None of these people knew anything about buildings. It was all I had done my entire life.

I drove home and told my wife, “I found something.” I had not been that happy in a long time.

Here’s the part I don’t usually say out loud. That break was hard. Walking away from a seven-figure stock package was hard. Moving from San Francisco to small-town Wisconsin was hard. Starting over at 42 was hard.

But it was a different kind of hard than the office.

The Reality: There are two kinds of hard, and most of us never stop to tell them apart.

There’s hard-on-purpose. You chose it. It moves you toward something you actually want. The cost is real, but it’s buying you something.

And there’s hard-by-accident. Nobody chose it. It just accumulated. The late nights, the politics, the scramble every time a big boss flew in. It was hard, but it wasn’t building anything. It was just grinding me down.

The office was hard-by-accident. The break was hard-on-purpose. Same level of difficulty. Completely different return.

Before I finally left, I sat in a weekly design meeting and watched everyone scramble because a big boss was flying in. I had done that scramble a hundred times. This time I saw it from the outside. I looked at them and realized I was looking at myself. That was the moment I knew. This is no life.

The trap is that they feel identical from the inside. Both leave you tired. Both make you feel like you’re working. And because they feel the same, we treat them the same. We grind through the avoidable stuff and call it discipline.

It isn’t discipline. It’s just friction you forgot to question.

There’s a line I keep coming back to. In order to achieve the same outcome, I needed to change the input or be open to different inputs. For years I kept feeding the same input into a system that was wearing me out, and I expected a different feeling to come out the other side. It never did.

So here’s how I tell the two apart now, before I commit another month to anything.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

I ask two questions. First: if this works, what does it get me? Not “will it feel good to finish.” What does it actually build. A skill, an asset, a relationship, a position I want to hold. If the honest answer is “nothing, I just don’t want to be the one who quit,” that’s hard-by-accident. Walk.

Second: am I the right person for this hard? The workshop room was full of people forcing themselves to learn something foreign. I had spent twenty years inside buildings. The work was hard either way, but for me it was hard-on-purpose, because I was building on something I already had. When the hard thing sits on top of your real edge, the difficulty is an investment. When it doesn’t, you’re just paying tuition for a seat that was never yours.

Two questions. Thirty seconds. It will save you months.

That same test runs through both halves of what I do now. Eyes Open is me teaching people to see what others miss inside a building, because reading a foundation crack is hard-on-purpose work that pays for itself. The lending side is the same instinct. I lend into deals other people avoid because they look hard. But hard isn’t the same as bad. Most of the time, hard-on-purpose is exactly where the return lives, as long as you can see the mechanics underneath it.

The reward part matters too, and I almost left it out. There’s another line I live by. You got to reward yourself, because if you don’t, that hard work is just for nothing. Picking the right hard is half of it. Marking it when you get through is the other half. Nobody hands you that. You take it.

The Bottom Line: hard isn’t the signal. Direction is. Hard-on-purpose builds something. Hard-by-accident just costs you and calls it character.

You’re not someone who avoids hard things. You’re someone who’s learning to spend your hard on purpose. That’s a different person than the one grinding through friction and hoping it counts.

That’s the whole shift this month. Choose your hard. Then make sure you reward yourself for clearing it.

—Jon

P.S. What’s a hard thing you’re grinding through right now that might be hard-by-accident? Reply and tell me. I read every one, whether it’s about a building or a deal.

Subscribe now

I was burned out. Properly burned out. The kind where you’ve been running so hard for so long that you’ve stopped being able to tell the difference between tired and empty. I’d been at Apple for years, engineering stores across the world, and on paper I had everything. I just couldn’t feel any of it anymore.

So I stepped away. Three months. No store openings, no travel schedule, no fires to put out at 2am in a time zone twelve hours ahead.

The first few weeks were strange. When your whole identity is wrapped up in being the guy who handles it, and then there’s nothing to handle, you find out how much of you was just the handling. I had to relearn how to be a person who wasn’t producing something. That’s harder than it sounds for someone wired like me.

Somewhere in that quiet, I signed up for a real estate investing class. I’m not even sure I had a grand plan. I think part of me just needed something to point my brain at that wasn’t Apple. Something to learn. A new problem.

And about halfway through that class, something landed on me that I should have seen my whole life.

Buildings are all I’ve ever done.

Twenty years of engineering. Hundreds of buildings across more than 20 countries. I knew what lived behind the drywall. The plumbing, the electrical, the foundations, the code violations, the stuff that decides whether a building is a good investment or a money pit. I'd spent my entire career learning to read buildings the way most people read a page. And I'd never once thought of that as something that could be mine. I'd always been building for someone else.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

The class wasn’t teaching me about real estate. It was holding up a mirror and showing me that I already knew real estate from the inside out. I just knew it from the engineering side instead of the investing side. Those are the same building. I’d been standing next to my own answer for two decades.

I came home and I told my wife. I said, I found something.

That’s the exact moment things turned. Not a business plan. Not a spreadsheet. Just that sentence to the person who’d watched me run on empty. I found something. And she could hear that it was different from anything I’d said in a long time.

Here’s what the months right after that actually looked like, because the realization is the easy part. The realization is a lightning strike. What comes next is work.

I had to figure out how an engineer becomes an investor without pretending to be something he’s not. I wasn’t going to become a pitch deck guy. I wasn’t going to learn to talk fast and trust the deal deck. My edge was the opposite of that. My edge was the building. So I leaned all the way into the thing I already knew. While other people were learning to read spreadsheets, I already knew how to read the asset the spreadsheet was describing.

I also had to make peace with leaving. Walking away from Apple meant walking away from real money and real security. Stock options. A title. The whole identity I’d built. The old me would have white knuckled the safe thing. But the three months had shown me what the safe thing was actually costing me, and it was costing me myself.

So I left. I built Blue Eyed Capital around the one thing I’d been doing my entire life without realizing it was the whole point.

The break didn’t give me a new skill. I already had the skills. What it gave me was the quiet to finally see them, and the honesty to admit that the safe path was the dangerous one.

I came back as someone else because I finally stopped running long enough to notice who I already was.

Three months off was the most productive quarter of my life. I just didn’t produce anything. I found something instead.

—Jon

Subscribe now

The answer was simple. “Your house was built in 1990. Same electrical. Same HVAC.”

Here’s the part that stung. None of that was true anymore. I had gutted the place. New panel, new wiring, new mechanical systems. The house behind my drywall had nothing in common with the house on their file.

But until I told them, I was paying a premium for a building that no longer existed.

The Reality: insurers don’t price what they know. They price what they assume. And the assumption is always the worst version of your building, frozen at the year it was built.

And here’s the part that should make you sit up. Your lender does the exact same thing.

Think about what an underwriter actually has when they price your risk. A year built. A square footage. Maybe a roof age someone wrote down once. They are not standing in your mechanical room. They are pricing a spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet defaults to old, tired, and risky unless someone proves otherwise.

That someone is you.

I have spent 20 years on the other side of this. I have engineered the systems these files describe, across 400-plus projects in more than 20 countries. I can tell you with certainty that the gap between what a building is and what its paperwork says is enormous. A 1990 build with a 2024 electrical system is a different risk than a 1990 build with 1990 wiring. Completely different. The fire data alone separates them.

But the file doesn’t know that. The file says 1990. So you pay 1990 money, every year, forever, on a risk you already eliminated.

Why does this matter beyond one annoying bill? Because it compounds. An insurance premium priced on a phantom system doesn’t hit you once. It hits you every renewal, for as long as you own the asset. On a portfolio, that’s real money leaking out the side of your operating statement. And a lender who prices you as the old building charges you for risk you already retired. You eat that spread on every draw.

The fix is not complicated. It’s evidence.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

Here is exactly what I keep, and what I hand over when I want to be priced on the building I actually own.

Start with photographs, dated. The new panel with the label legible. The new condensing unit with the model plate visible. New supply lines, new water heater, new roof underlayment before it got covered. If you replaced it and nobody can see it anymore, that’s precisely the thing you photograph, because that’s the upgrade you’re not getting credit for.

Then the paper. Permits, pulled and closed. Contractor invoices with scope and date. Spec sheets for the equipment you installed. A closed permit is the strongest single document you own, because a third party already verified the work. Keep them in one folder, named by system, so you’re not digging the night before a renewal.

Then translate it. Don’t hand an underwriter a shoebox. Write one page. System, what it was, what it is now, the year you changed it. “Electrical: original 1990 panel and branch wiring, fully replaced 2024, permit closed.” That sentence moves a number. Vague good intentions don’t.

Be specific about the things that actually move risk, because not every upgrade does. New paint doesn’t. A new roof, updated electrical, replaced plumbing supply lines, a modern HVAC system, added fire protection — those are the line items that change how a building burns, floods, or fails. Lead with those. The carrier and the lender care about the systems that cause the claims.

Then find a broker who can tell the story. The right insurance broker doesn’t just file your packet. They paint the picture of why your building is a better risk than its year built suggests. That’s their job. Hand them the evidence and let them do it. The owners who get the rate are the ones who give the broker something to work with.

I did all of this with one phone call and a folder. The rate moved. Not because I argued. Because I changed the assumption with evidence.

The bottom line: you are not priced on your building. You are priced on the last thing someone wrote down about it. And what gets written down defaults to the worst version of the truth.

So change the record. The same packet that lowers an insurance premium is the packet that earns you better terms from a lender, because both of them are pricing the same unknown and both of them will keep guessing high until you stop letting them.

You can keep paying for the building you used to have, or you can document the one you actually built and get priced on it. That choice is yours, and nobody else is going to make it for you.

—Jon

P.S. The full system-by-system version of this, every component and what a buyer or lender flags, is The $100K Blind Spot. Grab it here.

Subscribe now

This was at Apple. I was good at my job and I knew it. The problem is that knowing it turned into needing everyone else to know it too.

Here’s what that looks like up close. In meetings, I’d be the guy who already had the answer before the question finished. Someone would start to explain their approach, and I’d cut in with why mine was better. I wasn’t listening to understand. I was listening to win. I treated every discussion like a thing to be right about instead of a thing to be solved.

I thought I was being decisive. Confident. The strong technical voice in the room. What I was actually being was exhausting.

The moment it broke for me was the promotion I didn’t get. I had the resume for it. The work was there. The numbers were there. And it went to someone else, and the feedback I got was not about my engineering. My engineering was never the question. It was about the way I made people feel when they worked with me. I made them smaller so I could feel bigger. And leadership noticed, even when I thought I was hiding it behind competence.

That stung in a way I wasn’t ready for. Because I’d been telling myself that results were the only thing that mattered, and here were the results, and they weren’t enough. The thing standing between me and the next level was me.

I had to sit with a hard distinction after that. The difference between confidence and arrogance.

Confidence is believing in yourself. Arrogance is only believing in yourself.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

That one word, only, is the whole thing. Confidence has room in it for other people to be right. Arrogance doesn’t. Confidence says I know my work is good and so is yours, let’s go. Arrogance says I’m the smartest one here so everyone else should fall in line. I had been calling myself confident for years while behaving like the second one.

So I rebuilt. Not overnight, and not perfectly. But deliberately.

The first thing I changed was the simplest and the hardest. I started asking questions in meetings instead of delivering verdicts. Real questions. What’s the thinking behind that. What am I missing here. Walk me through it. And then I’d actually wait for the answer instead of loading my next point while they talked.

The second thing I learned is that being right and being effective are not the same thing. I could win the argument and lose the room. I’d done it a hundred times. A good idea that nobody wants to execute is worth less than a decent idea the whole team is bought into. The engineer in me hated that for a while. The leader in me needed to learn it.

The third thing took the longest. I had to get comfortable with other people getting the credit. When you stop needing to be the smartest person in the room, you free everyone in the room to actually be smart. The work got better. My teams got better. And the irony is that I got further by trying to take up less space.

This runs straight through how I work now. When a borrower walks me through their deal, I’m not waiting to show them I know more. I’m trying to understand what they’re actually building. My engineering background means I usually do see things they don’t, but the second I lead with that to feel superior, I’ve lost them. Confidence lets me bring 20 years of building experience to the table and still listen. Arrogance would have me talking over the very people I’m supposed to serve.

The promotion I lost taught me more than the ones I got. The ones I got told me I was good at the work. The one I lost told me the work was never the whole job.

Confidence built the business. Arrogance would have capped it years ago.

I’d rather believe in myself and leave room for everyone else. That’s the version of me worth working with.

—Jon

Subscribe now

Not because the funds blew up. Because the investors wanted their own money. They filled out the form, hit submit, and waited.

A lot of them are still waiting.

BCRED hit 7.9% in redemption requests against a 5% quarterly cap. Apollo’s vehicle ran around 11.2%. Ares around 11.6%. When the requests cross the cap, the fund does what the documents always said it could do. It gates. It pays out a slice, pro-rated, and tells everyone else to get in line for next quarter.

Picture that. You did the work. You read the deck. You wired the money. And the day you decided you wanted it back, a stranger you’ve never met got to decide how much of it you’d actually see.

The Reality: the yield was never the dangerous number on the page. The lockup was.

And here’s the part that should bother you more than the gates. To keep those headline yields looking healthy while borrowers struggle, some managers are leaning on something called PIK, paid-in-kind. Instead of a borrower paying interest in cash, the loan balance just grows by the interest owed. The income shows up on the statement. The cash does not. The number looks fine right up until the day you ask to convert it back into dollars.

So you’ve got two things happening at once. The exit got slower, and the “return” got softer. Investors felt the first one. They haven’t all felt the second one yet.

I spent 20 years as an engineer before I ran a dime of anyone’s money. When you design a building, you don’t get points for how good it looks on the day it opens. You get judged on what happens when something goes wrong. When the load shifts. When the system gets stressed. When everyone heads for the same exit at the same time. That’s the only test that counts.

A semi-liquid fund holding long-dated, illiquid loans and offering you a monthly door is a building with one narrow stairwell and a lobby full of people. It works beautifully until everyone walks toward the door on the same Tuesday.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

Here’s the engineering principle I’d hand you before you sign anything. Match the duration of the exit to the duration of the asset. If the loans inside the fund take years to mature, your ability to leave should not be measured in months. The mismatch is not a feature. It is the risk, dressed up as convenience.

So before you wire money into anything that calls itself liquid, run two questions. First: when, exactly, can I get my money out, and is that backed by what the fund actually owns or by the next investor’s deposit? Second: who decides if I can’t? Me, or the manager, in the quarter I least want them to.

If the honest answer to question one is “it depends on conditions,” and the honest answer to question two is “the manager,” you don’t have a liquid investment. You have a long lockup wearing a liquidity costume. That distinction is worth real money, because the cost of learning it the hard way is the gap between the statement you were promised and the wire you actually receive.

Now let me show you the other side of the same principle, because I run money on it.

Liquidity isn’t what the brochure says. It’s what you can actually do on the day you want your money, and who has to say yes.

Most investors read the yield and skip the exit. You’re learning to read the exit first. That one habit will protect more of your money than any return on any deck ever will.

—Jon

P.S. This is how we think about duration and exits in our own lending. If you want to see how a short-duration structure actually maps to investor liquidity, reply ‘duration’ and I’ll walk you through it.

Or you can check out our live fund dashboard and see our track record for yourself

Subscribe now

I want to tell you what those two things actually felt like, because the number doesn’t capture it and neither does the headline.

I was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at 11. Two years later, when I was 13, the same disease killed my father. So I learned what this thing could do before I learned how to manage it. That’s a heavy thing to hand a 13 year old. The disease that’s now living in your body is the one that took your dad.

For most of my life after that, I treated diabetes like a secret. I’d test under the table. I’d dose in the bathroom. I got fast at it. Slip the needle out, do the shot, put it away before anyone clocked what was happening. I didn’t want to be the sick guy in the room. I wanted to be the engineer who had everything handled.

Here’s the problem with handling everything quietly. The disease doesn’t care about your image.

There was a day in New York. I was at work, and my blood sugar dropped out from under me, and I had a seizure. A colleague called 911. I don’t remember most of it. I remember the after. The looks. The realization that the thing I’d worked so hard to hide had just announced itself to everyone in the loudest way possible, and I’d had zero control over the timing.

Another time I was on a plane. Right at takeoff, the worst possible moment, my blood sugar crashed. You’re strapped in. The seatbelt sign is on. You can’t get up, you can’t get to the galley, and your body is going into a hole. I got through it. But I sat there afterward thinking about how many times I’d cut it close because I was more worried about being seen than being safe.

That’s when the math finally clicked for me. And I’m a math guy, so this is how I actually think about it.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

Hiding the disease had a cost. Every time I dosed in secret, every time I skipped a check because someone was watching, I was trading my safety for my pride. And the bill for that trade doesn’t come due on a schedule. It comes due at takeoff. It comes due in a meeting in New York. It comes due at the worst possible moment, every time, because that’s how risk works when you ignore it.

So I stopped hiding the pump.

It sits on me now where people can see it. If it beeps in a meeting, it beeps. If someone asks, I tell them. It’s a medical device that keeps me alive, and pretending it isn’t there never made it less true. It just made me less safe.

That decision was smaller than the seizure and bigger than anything. Because the day I stopped hiding it was the day I admitted that managing this disease is a full time job that runs underneath my actual full time jobs. 11,786 days of injections and finger sticks and pump sites and 3am corrections. Every single day. No weekends off. No sick days from being sick.

People sometimes ask why I’m so disciplined about systems in my business. Why I build everything to fail safe instead of hoping it holds. Here’s the honest answer. I’ve been running a fail safe system on my own body for 34 years. I don’t get to skip the checks. I don’t get to assume it’ll be fine. I plan for the crash before it comes because I’ve felt the crash, and the crash does not negotiate.

That’s not a sob story. My dad didn’t get the tools I have. He didn’t get the pump, the monitor, the 34 years. I did. So I’m not going to waste them being embarrassed.

The needles kept me alive. Hiding them almost didn’t.

Now I let people see the machine. It turns out the people worth knowing don’t see weakness. They see a guy who shows up every day in a body that requires it.

—Jon

Subscribe now

I honestly did not get it at first. It sounded like a marketing trick. A word swap for a brochure.

Then I started using it. And it changed how I ran every building I touch.

Because the word you pick decides how you treat people. And how you treat people decides whether they stay. I wrote about that on LinkedIn this week. This is the part that wouldn’t fit in a post.

The Reality: that one word quietly runs your P&L.

Here’s the part nobody puts on a pro forma. The most expensive thing that happens in a building isn’t a roof or a boiler. It’s a unit going empty.

When someone leaves, the meter starts running. Lost rent while the unit sits. Make-ready costs to turn it.

Marketing to fill it. A leasing concession to close the deal. Then weeks before the new check shows up. You paid for all of that, and the unit produced nothing the whole time.

A resident who stays another year skips every line of that. No turn cost. No vacancy gap. No concession. Just the check, on time, again. And it compounds. The unit you don’t have to refill this year is the unit you don’t have to market, paint, and discount next year either.

I learned this lens at Apple. Nine years running engineering for their retail stores taught me one thing that maps straight onto real estate: know who your actual customer is.

Most operators think the customer is the investor. It isn’t. The customer is the person living in the unit. The investor is the beneficiary of that person being happy enough to stay.

The chain is simple. Happy residents stay. Turnover drops. Costs drop. Reviews improve. A waiting list forms. Income gets steady. And the investor return shows up at the end of that chain, not the front of it.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

Apple ran the same math on customer retention. The longer someone stays in the ecosystem, the lower the cost to serve them and the more they’re worth. A building is no different. Longer tenure, lower cost per resident, higher net income.

So when residents thrive, returns follow. Not the other way around. I’ll say it plainly. Their ideal customer has to be their resident. That’s how you make clear decisions about what you do with investor money. Get the order wrong and you optimize for the wrong person.

Once you see the building that way, spending gets clearer, not harder.

Most owners decide on CapEx by asking one question: what does it cost? That’s the wrong first question. The right one is, does this make the resident want to stay?

Run every dollar through that filter and it sorts itself into three buckets.

Bucket one. It keeps the resident. New in-unit washer and dryer. Faster maintenance response. A package room that works. Lighting in the parking lot so people feel safe walking to their door at night. These are not amenities. They are reasons not to leave. Fund them first.

Bucket two. It protects the building. Roof, foundation, the electrical panel behind the drywall, the boiler that’s one cold snap from failing. The resident never sees this work. But the day it breaks, they feel it, and some of them give notice over it. A unit with no heat in January doesn’t keep anyone. This is the floor. Never skip it.

Bucket three. It looks good in a photo and changes nothing. A lobby finish nobody asked for. A logo on the sign. A clubhouse upgrade in a building where residents stay for the location and the quiet. Spend here last, and only after the first two buckets are funded.

The mistake I watch people make is funding bucket three before bucket one. They put money where it photographs well instead of where it holds a resident. Then they’re surprised when turnover stays high and the photos didn’t move the needle.

Try it on the next decision in front of you. Take the spend you’re weighing this week and ask one thing before you ask the price: does this make someone want to renew? If yes, it’s an investment in your income. If no, it’s a cost. Costs wait. Income doesn’t.

Your job as an operator is to keep them there as long as possible. Every dollar either helps you do that or it doesn’t.

A resident who renews is worth more than a unit you have to refill. The word “resident” is just the reminder that you have someone worth keeping.

Most owners run their buildings on what things cost. You’re learning to run yours on what keeps people. That’s the difference between an owner and an operator.

—Jon

Subscribe now

Here’s the part I didn’t.

When the marriage ended in 2010, my mom called. She offered to help. Money, a place to land, whatever I needed. And I said no.

Not because I’m tough. Because something in me knew that if someone bailed me out of this, I’d never actually learn how to swim. This was my problem to solve. I had built the situation. I was going to be the one to climb out of it.

I want to be honest about what that decision cost. It cost me about seven years.

Seven years of being alone. Not lonely in the dramatic sense. Just alone. Coming home to a quiet apartment. Making my own plans for the weekend and then not making any. Learning how to sit with myself when there was no one else in the room to perform for.

I had spent my whole life up to that point being the guy who had it figured out. The engineer. The one with the answers. And here I was, in my early thirties, with nothing figured out at all.

Those seven years taught me three things I still use every single day.

The first one is that I’m more durable than I think. When you strip away the marriage, the money, and the story you tell about yourself, you find out what’s actually left. What was left in me was a guy who would get up the next morning and go to work. Every time. I didn’t always feel strong. I just kept moving. I learned that consistency is its own kind of strength, and it does not require you to feel anything in particular.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

The second one is that I had to like my own company before I could offer it to anyone else. For years I had outsourced how I felt to whoever was nearby. If they were happy, I was fine. If they weren’t, I wasn’t. Being alone forced me to build my own foundation instead of borrowing one. By the time I was ready to be a husband again, I came in whole. Not looking for someone to fix me. That changed everything about the marriage I have now.

The third one is the one that runs straight through my business. I learned that I’d rather take the hard road and own the outcome than take the easy road and owe somebody the story. My mom’s help would have been a kindness. But it would have also been a thread I’d carry forever. A small voice that said you didn’t really do it yourself. I couldn’t live with that voice. I still can’t.

That’s not pride. Pride would have been refusing help and then pretending the climb was easy. It wasn’t easy. There were months I counted dollars. There were nights the quiet got loud.

But I learned the difference between being humbled and being broken. Humbled is when life takes something from you and you let it teach you. Broken is when you let it take you too. I got humbled. I refused to get broken.

When people ask me how I underwrite risk the way I do, this is the real answer. I’m not afraid of a deal going sideways because I’ve already been all the way down once and built my way back with my own two hands. I know what the bottom feels like. I know I survive it. That’s not theory for me. It’s a memory.

The husband I am, the father I am, the way I run Blue Eyed Capital. All of it got forged in those seven years when no one was watching and no one was coming to save me.

I tell my kids a version of this without the heavy parts. Some things you have to do yourself. Not because help is bad, but because the doing is what makes you.

I’d do those seven years again. I just wouldn’t want to.

—Jon

Subscribe now

Fifty dollars times the units, times twelve months. He’d already done the math on a legal pad. It was a real number and it went straight to the top line.

I asked him one question. How many of these residents will leave over the fifty?

He didn’t have that number. Almost nobody does. The rent increase shows up on the spreadsheet the day you send the notice. The cost of the move-out shows up two months later, in a different column, and most owners rarely connect the two.

The Reality:

A rent increase is the most visible decision an owner makes, and the turnover it triggers is the most invisible cost they carry.

And here’s the part that should stop you. The fifty-dollar bump that reads as found money on the renewal can be the most expensive line in the building once one resident walks.

I learned this lens before I ever owned a unit. Nine years at Apple, running engineering for the retail stores. The whole company was built on one idea: the person standing in front of you is the customer, and everything you do is measured by whether they come back. Not the shareholder. The person at the counter.

Real estate flipped that for a long time. Owners treated the investor as the customer and the resident as the input. I think that’s backwards, and the affordability numbers are starting to prove it.

Look at where renters actually are right now. Across the country there are 22.7 million cost-burdened renter households. That’s 49% of all renters spending more than they should on housing. For renters earning $30,000 to $45,000, it’s worse. 72% of them are burdened. And the gap didn’t appear overnight. Since 2001, rents are up about 30%. Renter incomes are up about 9%. That spread is structural. It doesn’t close next year.

Here’s why that matters for the renewal decision. When a resident is already stretched, the fifty dollars isn’t a rounding error to them. It’s the line that makes them open Zillow. The same pressure that tempts you to raise rent is the pressure that makes the increase risky.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

So before you send a single renewal notice, run the math the legal pad skips.

Start with what a vacancy actually costs you, end to end. Not just the lost rent while the unit sits. Add the turn: paint, cleaning, flooring, the small repairs you defer while someone’s living there and can’t defer once they’re gone. Add the marketing and the leasing time. Add the concession you’ll give the next resident to fill it in a soft month. On a typical unit that whole package lands somewhere between two and four months of rent. Use your own building’s real number. You have the invoices.

Now put the two figures side by side. A $50 monthly bump is $600 a year. If that unit rents for $1,400 and a turnover costs you three months all-in, that’s roughly $4,200 gone the moment one resident leaves over the increase. You’d need that resident, plus six others who stayed, just to break even on the one who walked.

That ratio is the whole decision. Ask one question on every renewal: how many residents can I afford to lose at this number before the increase costs more than it earns? For most stable buildings the answer is “fewer than you’d guess,” and it reframes the bump from a top-line win into a bet on retention.

This is what it means when I say keep them there as long as possible. It isn’t softness. It’s the cheapest income strategy you have. A renewal is revenue with no turn cost, no vacancy, no concession. A retained resident is worth more than a new one at a higher rate, every time the math is close. And in this affordability environment, the math is almost always close.

The operators who win the next few years won’t be the ones who raised rent the most. They’ll be the ones who treated the resident like the customer and priced the renewal like they wanted the second check, not just the first.

Buildings don’t pay you. Residents do. The renewal notice is where most owners forget that.

You came into this reading a rent increase as income. You’re leaving able to price it as a risk, with a number to back you up. That’s the difference between an owner and an operator.

—Jon

Subscribe now

He thought he was buying a piece of my company.

He was not.

He was buying a slice of one product inside it.

The wire cleared on a Thursday. The confusion landed on my desk on Friday.

This one was my fault.

I want to walk through what actually happened, because I have started seeing the same pattern in three or four conversations a week, and the cleanest way to fix it is to put it in writing.

The investor and I had been talking for about a month. He had read a handful of LinkedIn posts. He had skimmed the newsletter. He had asked me, on a call, what my minimum was. I told him twenty-five thousand. He said he was in. He asked for wire instructions. I sent them.

He sent the money to Blue Eyed Capital.

What he believed, in his head, was that he had bought a slice of Blue Eyed Capital. The whole company. Like buying stock. Like becoming, in some small way, a partner in the operation.

What he had actually bought was a Class A position in the Blue Eyed Private Debt Fund I. Which is one product Blue Eyed Capital operates. Not the company itself.

When I called to walk him through the docs, I could hear the recalibration happen on the line. He was a good guy. He was not upset. He just had not understood. And the reason he had not understood is that I had not made it clear.

So here is the structure, said plainly.

Blue Eyed Capital is the company. I founded it. I run it. It is the entity that owns and operates everything below it.

Underneath that company are several products.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

The first is private debt lending. Short duration. Gap funding. EMD positions. Capped around five hundred thousand per loan. Underwritten on the actual deal. This is where the operational cashflow comes from. Nineteen loans funded since April 2023. Zero defaults. Around eighty percent of the loans are with borrowers who have come back to me a second, third, or fourth time.

The second is the fund. The Blue Eyed Private Debt Fund I. This is what lets accredited investors participate in the lending side without me having to ask any one of them for two hundred and fifty thousand dollars. Class A starts at twenty-five thousand. Eight percent preferred return. Trending around twenty-five percent annualized in distributions. Run under 506(c), which means accredited only and the verification is real, not a checkbox.

The third is real estate. The long-horizon side. Cash flowing assets. The wealth machine. Kept intentionally separate from the lending. Same company. Different product. Different risk profile. Different timeline.

The person who wired me twenty-five thousand had read about all three. He had heard me talk about all three. And he had still, understandably, conflated them into one thing.

My fault. Not his.

Here is the bigger pattern, because the wire is not actually the interesting part.

I keep hearing from accredited investors who have met me through one of the three doors and assumed that door was the whole house. Someone read the lending posts and asked if they could lend with me directly, side by side, as a partner. They cannot. That is not a product I sell. Someone else read about the fund and asked if I would put their capital into a specific deal of their choosing. I will not. That is not how the fund works. Someone else read about the real estate side and asked if they could buy in to my next acquisition. They cannot. That is not on the menu.

None of these are bad questions. They are the right questions if the picture you have is incomplete.

The fix is structural. The fix is that whenever I talk about any one of the three, I have to also point to the other two, so the architecture is visible.

I am not a fund manager. I am the founder of a lending company that, among other things, operates a fund. The distinction matters because what you are buying is not me. What you are buying is a position inside a product inside a company. Read the docs. Read the operating agreement. Ask the structural question before you wire.

The structural question is this. What entity am I sending money to. What product is that entity selling. What position am I taking inside that product. What governs my exit.

That is it. Four questions. Most investors, in any asset class, only ask the first one.

Cashflow pays the bills. Appreciation builds wealth. The lending product runs hot and operational. The real estate product runs slow and patient. The fund sits inside the lending. None of these is the same as the company. The company is the thing that owns and operates all of them.

If any of this is the first time you are reading it laid out this way, that is on me. The cleanup is mine to write. I am writing it.

If you got this far and you know somebody who is about to wire money into something they have not fully read the docs on, forward this to them. I would rather they ask the structural question before the wire than after.

—Jon

Reply hits my inbox. I read every one.

Subscribe now

You won’t find it on a tour. There’s a layer underneath the iconic hall that runs the building — the steam, the power, the mechanical guts that move a million commuters a day without any of them thinking about it. The architecture on the postcards works because of an entire other building you don’t see.

That’s what I think about when people ask what running a property actually looks like. Not the floor plan. Not the cap rate. The layer underneath.

June was two stories about that layer. A missing meter the takeover audit didn’t catch. A water bill that climbed twenty-five percent because of a meter problem nobody believed in. Both were in the building the whole time. Both were invisible until somebody got close enough to look.

Here is what the data says about that closer look. An Abt Global study earlier this year ran regression analysis across 248 properties at nineteen organizations. Buildings with real resident services produced $1,183 more NOI per unit per year. A 26 percent NOI advantage at 99 percent confidence. Every $100 per unit invested in resident services returned $259 in NOI and $397 in total revenue. A 2.6x return.

That is not a survey. That is regression on real operating numbers. The buildings making more money are the ones being operated by people who treat the residents as the actual customer. Why do you think Apple has one of the highest grossing retail dollars per square foot of space?

While that math has been working quietly, costs are moving fast. Nonresidential construction input prices are running at a 12.6 percent annualized pace this year. Steel up almost twelve percent. Mid-rise multifamily carrying fifteen to twenty-five dollars per square foot in embedded tariff cost. A lot of CapEx reserves were set on yesterday’s numbers.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

And the regulators are doing the third thing. Colorado just clarified that existing multifamily can keep using ratio utility billing, but every new build after July 1, 2027, has to install individual unit meters. The state is doing on the front end what the missing-meter story I told you on June 4 should have done on mine.

Three different forces, same direction. The owners who win from here show up at the operating layer. They know what’s behind their walls. They run resident programs like the business they are. They reprice CapEx for the world we’re actually in.

The small piece you can take from June. Pick one property. Walk it. Look at the meters, the resident services, the systems that run when nobody’s watching. If your answer is “mostly,” that’s the work for July.

July is about the other side of the equation. Not buying. Not auditing. Running a building.

—Jon

P.S. If any of June's letters landed for someone you know, forward it. Someone is about to write a six-figure check. Someone running a property and wondering where the leak is. Someone who's been quiet because the spreadsheet says everything's fine. The Eyes Open list grows one engineer-minded investor at a time.

Subscribe now

The notebook had six modular plots in it. Small lots, in a market I understood, at a price I had run six different ways by the time anyone else got to the table. I had soil notes. I had cost-per-square-foot pulled from three modular suppliers. I had a phasing model. I had a tax map. I had a comparable rents file. I had a punch list of zoning issues I was going to have to clear. I had a spreadsheet that had been edited so many times the original column headers were no longer visible at the top of the page.

What I did not have was a deposit on any of the six lots.

If you had asked me at the time, I would have told you I was being careful. I would have told you I was running the numbers properly. I would have told you that this was due diligence.

What I was actually doing was inspecting.

There is a distinction I have spent a lot of years trying to put words to, and I am going to try it again now because I think it is the single most expensive lesson I have ever paid for.

Inspecting is gathering data. Inspecting is engineering mode. You look at the thing in front of you and you ask what is it, what is it made of, what condition is it in, what is missing, what might break.

Assessing is the other thing. Assessing is investor mode. Assessing is the question of how I would want my money spent on this, how long I am going to hold it, whether the math survives a slow rental market, what the actual exit looks like, what happens if I tie my capital up here and not somewhere else.

They are not the same. They look the same from the outside. They feel the same when you are sitting in front of a spreadsheet at the kitchen table. They are not the same.

In 2010 I inspected those six plots into the ground. The construction risk, which is what usually scares investors out of the room, was the part of the deal I had spent two decades getting paid to manage. I was the guy you wanted in the room for that conversation. I knew what could go wrong, what each module would cost to install, what the schedule looked like with weather, what the labor pool around those lots was capable of.

I did not have an answer to the question that mattered.

The question that mattered was. Am I going to put a deposit down or not.

A senior developer pulled me aside one afternoon and told me, plainly, that the work I had done was good. That the plan was sound. That if I did not lock up the land in the next thirty to sixty days with a non-refundable deposit, somebody else would. He told me that the analysis was a separate question from the decision to participate. He told me they were not the same question.

I did not listen. I went back to the notebook. I refined the spreadsheet. I added a scenario. I gave myself another month.

The land was gone within the month. Not because the market moved. Because somebody less detailed than me committed.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

I lost more than a deal that summer. I lost a year of momentum. I lost a piece of the version of myself I had been trying to become, the version that could carry the engineering brain into a different kind of building. The version that could be both.

That is the moment the dual lens framework started for me, even though I did not have the language for it for another decade.

What I had been doing was inspecting forever, because inspecting is safe. Inspecting feels like working. Inspecting produces artifacts. Inspecting is the part of the process that I was trained for, that I was paid for, that I was good at.

Assessing is uncomfortable. Assessing is naked. Assessing is the part where the engineer puts the clipboard down and a different person picks up the pen. Assessing is where you have to admit that no amount of additional inspecting will tell you whether to commit. At some point the data stops, and a decision is the only thing left.

I did not ask myself that question in 2010. I asked it for the first time in 2011, on a different deal, after I had already paid for not asking.

This is what I want you to take from this if you take anything.

When you find yourself rerunning the same numbers, look up from the spreadsheet and ask which mode you are in. If you have been inspecting for a month, the additional inspection is not making the decision any clearer. The decision is a different muscle. You have to switch to it on purpose.

The engineer in me still wants one more data point. He always will. The investor in me has learned that one more data point is the most expensive line item in any analysis.

—Jon

If you are in the middle of a decision right now and you cannot tell which mode you are in, hit reply with the deal. No pitch. No advice. Just a real second pair of eyes. The question I forgot to ask myself in 2010 is the one I will ask you.

Subscribe now

Not on a brand-new property. Not after a renovation. Not during a heat wave that would have made the irrigation pop. On a building that had been operating the same way, with the same residents, the same fixtures, the same routine, for months.

I called the utility. They said the meter was reading correctly and the usage was real. I went to my team. They said nothing had changed on our end. Both sides were pointing at the other. Neither side was wrong from where they were standing.

I spent months on this. I pulled historicals. I had the building walked unit by unit looking for a leak. I read meter logs at hours of the day I should have been asleep. I argued with people inside my organization who thought I was chasing a ghost, and I argued with people at the utility who thought I was a customer who didn’t want to pay his bill.

I will tell you what the hardest part was. It wasn’t the water cost. It was the part there was no logical reason to it all. The data on the page said consumption. My gut said the building wasn’t using that much. There is a particular kind of frustration that comes from being the only person who thinks something is wrong, while the systems keep producing numbers that say it isn’t.

The answer turned out to be the meter. Not the consumption, not a leak, not the residents, not the operations team. The infrastructure itself had a problem, and the problem was producing a reading the utility was happy to bill against.

Here is the part I want you to hold onto. The system told us, every single day for months, that everything was fine. The data confirmed the bill. The bill confirmed the data. The only thing that didn’t confirm it was the building, and the building doesn’t speak in spreadsheets. It speaks in physical intuition, in the kind of “this doesn’t add up” feeling you get when you’ve walked enough properties that your gut runs the numbers before your head does.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

The lesson I keep telling my team since that one. You have to investigate this stuff. You have to measure to know. And when the measurement and the reality stop matching, the measurement is the suspect, not the reality.

The smallest piece you can take from this. Every month, on every property, look at three things on every utility bill. The reading. The trend against the same month last year. And whether what the bill says is roughly what your building, based on what it actually does, should consume. If two of those three line up and one doesn’t, you have an investigation, not an explanation.

Tell me about the weirdest utility moment you have ever had on a property you own or operate.

—Jon

Hit reply. I read every one of these, and the ones that turn into Eyes Open content go back out to readers with no name attached unless you tell me to put yours on it.

Subscribe now

I have said that in a few rooms and watched a few architects flinch. It is still true. Glass has terrible thermal performance. It moves heat in and out of a building like a screen door. It has weight problems. It has labor problems. Every joint is a future failure point.

And Apple loved it. Apple still loves it. The brief on every flagship store I worked on for nine years opened with some version of the same idea — the building has to feel like glass, like air, like the product is floating in light.

My job inside that brief was to make the building actually perform. To make it stay cool in Dubai. To stay warm in Brussels. To not condensate in Shanghai. To not blind a customer in Sydney at three in the afternoon. To not load a structural team with weight they could not justify.

We couldn’t fight the constraint. Glass was not going away. That was the religion. My job was to engineer around the religion.

Most of that work nobody ever sees. Custom fabric ducting behind a video wall so the cooled air dropped into the room exactly where customer bodies stood, but never blew across the merchandise. Tinted interlayers that you could not see were there. Frit patterns at the top of the pane that broke the worst of the solar load while leaving the bottom four feet clear so the storefront still read like glass. Thermal breaks inside the mullions you would never notice unless you were looking for them.

Most of it shipped. Some of it did not.

The ones that did not ship are the ones I want to tell you about today, because they are what I think about whenever I am underwriting a deal.

There was a sliding glass system we built three times. Worldwide largest in retail. The first set took three minutes to traverse twenty feet. That is too slow. A customer at a storefront does not wait three minutes. So we went back. The second set was faster. Not fast enough. We went back again. The third set was forty-five seconds.

We did not ship the version that took three minutes. We did not put it in the store and tell ourselves the customer would adapt. We did not say good enough. The decision in the room was the same decision every time. If it is not right, it does not go.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

That sounds nice on a stage. It is brutal in practice. It means somebody on a fixed budget and a fixed opening date is going to lose. Somebody is going to have to tell their team the work they did for six months is not going in. Somebody is going to have to explain to finance why the line is over. Somebody is going to have to absorb the schedule. Sometimes that somebody was me.

It also means the building that finally opens is the one that the customer experiences. Not the one we hoped the customer would experience.

Apple gets called a lot of things. The thing it gets called least is patient. From the outside it looks like everything happens fast and everything is polished. From the inside it is mostly people who refuse to ship the thing that is not right, and pay for that refusal in real money and real careers.

Here is why I am still talking about it nine years later.

When I underwrite a loan now, the most important question is not the rate. It is not the term. It is the version question. Which version of this deal am I being shown? Is this the first version that opened in three minutes, dressed up to look like the forty-five second version? Is this the version where somebody got tired and shipped what they had?

Most of the deals that go bad are not bad ideas. They are good ideas that shipped early. The operator ran out of capital. Or out of patience. Or out of the appetite to tell the truth about what was not working. And the version that closed was the version everybody had stopped fighting for.

I try, with mixed success, to ask the version question of myself. Of the borrowers I lend to. Of the buildings I walk. Is this the right version of this thing, or is this the version we got tired enough to call the right version.

The glass that was supposed to ship is rarely the glass that ships. The discipline is in noticing the difference before everybody else does, and being willing to pay for the gap.

—Jon

If this one landed, forward it to whoever you are about to ship something with. I think they will know what to do with it.

Subscribe now

We pushed a camera down the line. Ten feet past the building, there was a crack.

Caught before close, the repair was thirty to fifty thousand dollars. Caught after close, the same crack becomes evacuation, sewage backup, displacement, health hazard, lawsuit. Five hundred thousand and up, fast.

The inspector did his job. He walked the building. He looked at what he could see. The thing that mattered was ten feet outside the foundation, underground, where no walkthrough ever goes.

Here is what is changing under us right now. As of April 22 of this year, California sellers of any 3+ unit property with balconies, decks, walkways, or elevated exterior elements have to disclose the most recent inspection report at sale. The state stopped trusting that buyers and sellers would handle it. They put it in writing.

Read that twice. Legislators wrote into law the thing that buyers should have been doing on their own. Not because the law caught up with best practice. Because too many people kept handing over six-figure checks based on a report that was, in the eyes of the people doing the inspecting, never meant to carry that weight.

A clean inspection report tells you what was visible the day someone walked through. It does not tell you what was behind closed doors. It does not tell you what was painted over the week before. It does not tell you what is ten feet outside the foundation. It tells you the person walking did not see a problem in the rooms they were shown.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

Here is the small piece you can act on. Before your next close, get three things in writing from your inspector. The exact scope they covered. The systems they did not access. The specific recommendations they would make if they were the buyer. If you cannot get all three on paper, you do not have an inspection report. You have a permission slip.

The plumbing scope on that deal cost a few thousand dollars. Without it, the answer was going to be paid by either the seller in a price cut, or the buyer in a catastrophe. There was no third option.

I am not anti-inspector. The good ones are worth every dollar. The point is that the report is a starting line, not a finish line. The state of California just agreed.

Next week I want to tell you about the time the answer was not in the inspection report at all — it was in a utility bill nobody had read for twenty months.

—Jon

P.S. — The $100K Blind Spot is the 9-system check I run before I buy any building — it’s how the six-figure surprise shows up while you can still walk away, not after you’ve signed. Live now, $29 founding rate, first 100 buyers → https://blueeyedcapital.com/eyes-open/blind-spot/

Subscribe now

The difference looks small on paper. It is not small. It is the difference between paying twice for the same problem and paying once for the actual answer.

Here is what I mean.

Last year a friend of mine was running an unhappy second-floor unit. The complaint was always the same. The living room was hot in the afternoon. The bedrooms were freezing. The thermostat was set to seventy-two and nobody believed it.

He called his HVAC guy. The HVAC guy looked at the equipment, said the unit was undersized for the square footage, and quoted him a new condenser, a larger air handler, and a re-balance of the supply.

The quote was eleven thousand dollars. The conversation took twenty minutes. The HVAC contractor never asked about the building.

This is the gap I want to talk about today.

When you replace HVAC equipment, you are solving for one variable inside a system that has five. The other four are the envelope. Walls, roof, windows, doors. If your envelope is leaking, if your attic insulation has settled, if the original builder used single pane glass on the west elevation, your HVAC system is fighting a problem the HVAC system did not create and cannot fix.

We walked the unit. The west-facing living room had two original windows from 1986. The attic above that unit had insulation packed down to maybe an inch of effective R-value because of years of foot traffic from people running cable. The duct serving the master bedroom was crushed where it crossed a joist. Not a little. Crushed flat.

The new condenser would not have fixed any of that. The new condenser would have been a bigger pump pushing harder against the same wall.

We spent about thirty-two hundred dollars. Two windows. A weekend of attic work. A duct replacement section that took a tech three hours. Same thermostat. Same equipment. Complaint gone.

This is not a story about a clever fix. This is a story about who you let make the diagnosis.

🏠 Interested in starting or growing your real estate portfolio? Join a community of changemakers investing to build wealth and create impact.

Sign Up Today!

The reason your HVAC contractor does not ask about your envelope is not because he is bad at his job. He is good at his job. His job is HVAC. The envelope is somebody else’s job. He is going to quote you the thing he sells. That is what contractors do.

Your job is bigger than his. Your job is the building. The building does not respect the line between HVAC and envelope and plumbing and electrical. The building treats those as one system because that is what they are.

A couple of practical things from twenty years of watching this play out.

Before you replace any major piece of equipment, ask what changed. If the equipment is the same age it has been for years and the complaint is new, the complaint is not coming from the equipment. Something else moved.

When you get a quote, ask the contractor what assumptions the quote is built on. If the answer is the square footage and the rated capacity of the unit, you have your answer. He is not modeling the building. He is sizing a box.

Walk the rooms above and below the unit in question before you sign anything. Touch the wall on the west side at three in the afternoon. Look at the ceiling stains in the closet. Open the panel and look at the duct. None of this is engineering. It is paying attention.

Finally, this is the difference between maintain and enhance, which is something I keep coming back to. Maintain is keeping the building functioning. Enhance is making it better. The eleven thousand dollar quote was an enhance disguised as a maintain. The actual maintain — the windows, the insulation, the duct — was cheaper and solved the real problem.

When the system is fighting itself, the answer is rarely a bigger fan.

—Jon

Reply and tell me the dumbest fix you ever paid for that did not fix the thing. I have a long list of my own.

Subscribe now